NY Times Op-Ed "Are We Too Late?"
H.D.S. Greenway begins to talk about the elephant in the room, and asks what has really been forbidden territory in the climate discussion for most of the mainstream policymakers--up until now guided by 2 degrees C threshold thinking. i.e. "What if the trend is irreversible?" "What if it cannot be prevented?"
The effects of humanity’s industry, piggy-backing on a normal
warming trend that has been going on since the 19th century, is causing
temperatures to climb at an unprecedented rate. On that most of science
agrees. But what if the centuries-long build–up of gasses and nature
itself have conspired to make this trend irreversible?
not an argument against a strong effort on the part of mankind to at
least slow down the warming. The United States and the world can and
should make a big effort to stop making the problem worse.
the world is not united. The developing countries feel it is unfair to
demand caps just as they are industrializing, and we are moving into a
post-industrial economy. It is simply not possible to shut down enough
of the world’s smoke stacks, and a lot of cap and trade begins to sound
like a shell game.
So when the world meets in Copenhagen to
discuss climate change come December, I hope there will be more thought
on what has to be done if climate change cannot be prevented.